Graduate Algebraic Geometry Seminar: Difference between revisions
(→May 1) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''' | ''' | ||
'''When:''' Wednesdays 4: | '''When:''' Wednesdays 4:10pm | ||
'''Where:''' Van Vleck | '''Where:''' Van Vleck B215 (Fall 2018) | ||
[[Image:cat.jpg|thumb|220px| | Lizzie the OFFICIAL mascot of GAGS!!]] | [[Image:cat.jpg|thumb|220px| | Lizzie the OFFICIAL mascot of GAGS!!]] | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== Give a talk! == | == Give a talk! == | ||
We need volunteers to give talks this semester. If you're interested contact [mailto:cbooms@wisc.edu Caitlyn] or [mailto:drwagner@math.wisc.edu David], or just add yourself to the list (though in that case we might move your talk later without your permission). Beginning graduate students are particularly encouraged to give a talk, since it's a great way to get your feet wet with the material. | We need volunteers to give talks this semester. If you're interested contact [mailto:cbooms@wisc.edu Caitlyn] or [mailto:drwagner@math.wisc.edu David], or just add yourself to the list (though in that case we might move your talk later without your permission). Beginning graduate students are particularly encouraged to give a talk, since it's a great way to get your feet wet with the material. | ||
== Being an audience member == | == Being an audience member == | ||
Line 105: | Line 106: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
== | == Autumn 2018 == | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
Line 114: | Line 115: | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" width="300" align="center"|'''Title (click to see abstract)''' | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" width="300" align="center"|'''Title (click to see abstract)''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#E0E0E0"| | | bgcolor="#E0E0E0"| September 12 | ||
| bgcolor="#C6D46E"| | | bgcolor="#C6D46E"| Moisés Herradón Cueto | ||
| bgcolor="#BCE2FE"|[[# | | bgcolor="#BCE2FE"|[[Graduate Algebraic Geometry Seminar Fall 2018#September 12| Hodge Theory: One hour closer to understanding what it's about]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#E0E0E0"| | | bgcolor="#E0E0E0"| September 19 | ||
| bgcolor="#C6D46E"| | | bgcolor="#C6D46E"| Caitlyn Booms | ||
| bgcolor="#BCE2FE"|[[# | | bgcolor="#BCE2FE"|[[Graduate Algebraic Geometry Seminar Fall 2018#September 12| Linear Resolutions of Edge Ideals]] | ||
|- | |||
| bgcolor="#E0E0E0"| September 26 | |||
| bgcolor="#C6D46E"| Qiao He | |||
| bgcolor="#BCE2FE"|[[Graduate Algebraic Geometry Seminar Fall 2018#September 26| An Elementary Introduction to Geometric Langlands]] | |||
|- | |||
| bgcolor="#E0E0E0"| October 3 | |||
| bgcolor="#C6D46E"| Wanlin Li | |||
| bgcolor="#BCE2FE"|[[Graduate Algebraic Geometry Seminar Fall 2018#October 3| Gonality of Curves and More]] | |||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#E0E0E0"| | | bgcolor="#E0E0E0"| October 10 | ||
| bgcolor="#C6D46E"| | | bgcolor="#C6D46E"| Ewan Dalby | ||
| bgcolor="#BCE2FE"|[[# | | bgcolor="#BCE2FE"|[[Graduate Algebraic Geometry Seminar Fall 2018#October 10| A Gentle introduction to Grothendieck's Galois theory]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#E0E0E0"| | | bgcolor="#E0E0E0"| October 17 | ||
| bgcolor="#C6D46E"| | | bgcolor="#C6D46E"| Johnnie Han | ||
| bgcolor="#BCE2FE"|[[# | | bgcolor="#BCE2FE"|[[Graduate Algebraic Geometry Seminar Fall 2018#October 17| Schubert Calculus]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#E0E0E0"| | | bgcolor="#E0E0E0"| October 24 | ||
| bgcolor="#C6D46E"| | | bgcolor="#C6D46E"| Solly Parenti | ||
| bgcolor="#BCE2FE"|[[# | | bgcolor="#BCE2FE"|[[Graduate Algebraic Geometry Seminar Fall 2018#October 24| Quadratic Polynomials]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#E0E0E0"| | | bgcolor="#E0E0E0"| October 31 | ||
| bgcolor="#C6D46E"| Brandon Boggess | | bgcolor="#C6D46E"| Brandon Boggess | ||
| bgcolor="#BCE2FE"|[[# | | bgcolor="#BCE2FE"|[[Graduate Algebraic Geometry Seminar Fall 2018#October 31| How to Parameterize Elliptic Curves and Influence People]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#E0E0E0"| | | bgcolor="#E0E0E0"| November 7 | ||
| bgcolor="#C6D46E"| | | bgcolor="#C6D46E"| Vladimir Sotirov | ||
| bgcolor="#BCE2FE"|[[# | | bgcolor="#BCE2FE"|[[Graduate Algebraic Geometry Seminar Fall 2018#November 7| Morita Duality and Local Duality]] | ||
|- | |||
| bgcolor="#E0E0E0"| November 14 | |||
| bgcolor="#C6D46E"| David Wagner | |||
| bgcolor="#BCE2FE"|[[Graduate Algebraic Geometry Seminar Fall 2018#November 14| Homological Projective Duality]] | |||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#E0E0E0"| | | bgcolor="#E0E0E0"| November 21 | ||
| bgcolor="#C6D46E"| | | bgcolor="#C6D46E"| A turkey/Smallpox | ||
| bgcolor="#BCE2FE"|[[# | | bgcolor="#BCE2FE"|[[Graduate Algebraic Geometry Seminar Fall 2018#November 21| TBD]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#E0E0E0"| | | bgcolor="#E0E0E0"| November 28 | ||
| bgcolor="#C6D46E"| | | bgcolor="#C6D46E"| Asvin Gothandaraman | ||
| bgcolor="#BCE2FE"|[[# | | bgcolor="#BCE2FE"|[[Graduate Algebraic Geometry Seminar Fall 2018#November 30| Deformation Theory]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#E0E0E0"| | | bgcolor="#E0E0E0"| December 5 | ||
| bgcolor="#C6D46E"| Soumya Sankar | | bgcolor="#C6D46E"| Soumya Sankar | ||
| bgcolor="#BCE2FE"|[[# | | bgcolor="#BCE2FE"|[[Graduate Algebraic Geometry Seminar Fall 2018#December 5| One Step Closer to <math>B_{cris}</math>]] | ||
|- | |||
| bgcolor="#E0E0E0"| December 12 | |||
| bgcolor="#C6D46E"| Sun Woo Park | |||
| bgcolor="#BCE2FE"|[[Graduate Algebraic Geometry Seminar Fall 2018#December 12| A Survey of Newton Polygons]] | |||
|} | |||
</center> | |||
== September 12 == | |||
<center> | |||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | |||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="# | | bgcolor="#A6B658" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | '''Moisés Herradón Cueto''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="# | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | Title: Hodge Theory: One hour closer to understanding what it's about | ||
| bgcolor="# | |- | ||
| bgcolor="# | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | | ||
|} | Abstract: | ||
Following the request for baby Hodge theory from our meeting last semester, I will speak for one hour about Hodge theory, starting from the beginning of times, as they say. There will be d's, dbar's, Kählers and Hodge structures, but that's the extent of my promises. It will be a joyful time! | |||
|} | |||
</center> | |||
== September 19 == | |||
<center> | |||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | |||
|- | |||
| bgcolor="#A6B658" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | '''Caitlyn Booms''' | |||
|- | |||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | Title: Linear Resolutions of Edge Ideals | |||
|- | |||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | | |||
Abstract: | |||
We will briefly discuss monomial ideals in the multivariate polynomial ring over an algebraically closed field and some of their properties, including what it means for an ideal to have a linear resolution. Then we will talk about graphs on n vertices and their corresponding edge ideals, which are a particular kind of monomial ideal. Together, these will help us understand Froberg's Theorem, which says exactly when an edge ideal has a linear resolution. This talk will focus on a few computational examples and will end with some open questions and conjectures related to the presented material. | |||
|} | |||
</center> | </center> | ||
== | == September 26 == | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | {| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#A6B658" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' | | bgcolor="#A6B658" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | '''Qiao He''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | Title: | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | Title: An Elementary Introduction to Geometric Langlands | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | | ||
Abstract: | Abstract: | ||
I will start with the a rough statement of global langlands correspondence which suggest some correspondence between Galois representation and automorphic representation. Given this motivation, I will try to explain how can we replace both Galois side and Automorphic side with algebraic geometry objects. After that I will sketch what the geometric Langlands should be in this context. | |||
|} | |} | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
== | == October 3 == | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | {| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#A6B658" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' | | bgcolor="#A6B658" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | '''Wanlin Li''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | Title: | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | Title: Gonality of Curves and More | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | Abstract: I will | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | | ||
Abstract: | |||
I will introduce an invariant, gonality of curves, from the definition, properties to its applications on modular curves. | |||
|} | |} | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
== | == October 10 == | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | {| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#A6B658" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' | | bgcolor="#A6B658" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | '''Ewan Dalby''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | Title: | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | Title: A Gentle introduction to Grothendiecks Galois theory | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | Abstract: | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | | ||
Abstract: | |||
We all know and love Galois theory as it applies to fields and their extensions. Grothendieck, as always, showed how to lever the same ideas much more generally in algebraic geometry. I will try to explain how things work for the case of commutative rings in an "elementary" fashion. | |||
|} | |} | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
== | == October 17 == | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | {| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#A6B658" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' | | bgcolor="#A6B658" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | '''Johnnie Han''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | Title: | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | Title: Schubert Calculus | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | Abstract: | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | | ||
Abstract: | |||
In this talk, we’ll go back to 19th-century Europe, when enumerative geometric questions like “how many lines intersect a quadric” or “how many lines lie on a cubic surface” were answered without even knowing the intersection pairing existed! We’ll go through the methods of Schubert calculus with examples and talk briefly about Steiner’s conics problem, when a famous mathematician was actually proven completely wrong. | |||
|} | |} | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
== | == October 24 == | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | {| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#A6B658" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' | | bgcolor="#A6B658" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | '''Solly Parenti''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | Title: | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | Title: Quadratic Polynomials | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | Abstract: | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | | ||
Abstract: | |||
Quadratic polynomials have been studied forever. You can't just like play around with them and expect cool exciting math things like modular forms or special values of L-functions to show up, that would be ridiculous. | |||
|} | |} | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
== | == October 31 == | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | {| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | ||
Line 239: | Line 285: | ||
| bgcolor="#A6B658" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | '''Brandon Boggess''' | | bgcolor="#A6B658" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | '''Brandon Boggess''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | Title: | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | Title: How to Parameterize Elliptic Curves and Influence People | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | Abstract: | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | | ||
Abstract: | |||
A classical guide to classifying curves for the geometrically minded grad student. I will assume basically zero AG background. | |||
|} | |} | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
== | == November 7 == | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | {| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#A6B658" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' | | bgcolor="#A6B658" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | '''Vladimir Sotirov''' | ||
|- | |||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | Title: Morita duality and local duality | |||
|- | |||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | | |||
Abstract: | |||
I will explain what it means for a ring to admit a dualizing module and how to construct such for nice local rings. | |||
|} | |||
</center> | |||
== November 14 == | |||
<center> | |||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | |||
|- | |||
| bgcolor="#A6B658" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | '''David Wagner''' | |||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | Title: | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | Title: Homological Projective Duality | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | Abstract: | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | | ||
Abstract: | |||
I will introduce the derived category with the goal of undestanding Kuznetsov's HPD, a mysterious phenomenon which has produced a great number of examples and theorems in AG. We will give a demonstration of the duality in the case of an intersection of quadrics. | |||
|} | |} | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
== | == November 21 == | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | {| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#A6B658" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' | | bgcolor="#A6B658" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | '''TBD''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | Title: | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | Title: TBD | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | Abstract: | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | | ||
Abstract: | |||
TBD | |||
|} | |} | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
== | == November 28 == | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | {| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#A6B658" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' | | bgcolor="#A6B658" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | '''Asvin G''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | Title: | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | Title: Deformation Theory | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | Abstract: | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | | ||
Abstract: | |||
I will explain what deformation theory is and how to use it by doing a few examples. | |||
|} | |} | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
== | == November 7 == | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | {| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#A6B658" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' | | bgcolor="#A6B658" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | '''TBD''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | Title: | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | Title: TBD | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | Abstract: | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | | ||
Abstract: | |||
TBD | |||
|} | |} | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
== | == December 5 == | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | {| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#A6B658" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' | | bgcolor="#A6B658" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | '''Soumya Sankar''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | Title: | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | Title: One Step Closet to <math>B_{cris}</math> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | Abstract: | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | | ||
Abstract: I will talk about various comparison theorems in <math>p</math>-adic cohomology, and time permitting, describe the crystalline side of things in greater detail. | |||
|} | |} | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
== | == December 12 == | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | {| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#A6B658" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' | | bgcolor="#A6B658" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | '''Sun Woo Park''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | Title: | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | Title: A Survey of Newton Polygons | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | Abstract: | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | | ||
Abstract: I will give a survey on how understanding newton polygons can be useful in solving many different problems in algebraic geometry: from the proof of p-adic Weierstrass Formula to the re-formulization of Tate's Algorithm for elliptic curves. (Since I will focus on providing various applications of newton polygons, I will not be able to present rigorous proofs to most of the statements I will make in this talk.) | |||
|} | |} | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
== Organizers' Contact Info == | == Organizers' Contact Info == | ||
[https://sites.google.com/wisc.edu/cbooms/ Caitlyn Booms] | [https://sites.google.com/wisc.edu/cbooms/ Caitlyn Booms] | ||
[http://www.math.wisc.edu/~drwagner/ David Wagner] | [http://www.math.wisc.edu/~drwagner/ David Wagner] | ||
== Past Semesters == | == Past Semesters == | ||
[https://www.math.wisc.edu/wiki/index.php/Graduate_Algebraic_Geometry_Seminar_Spring_2019 Spring 2019] | |||
[https://www.math.wisc.edu/wiki/index.php/Graduate_Algebraic_Geometry_Seminar_Fall_2018 Fall 2018] | [https://www.math.wisc.edu/wiki/index.php/Graduate_Algebraic_Geometry_Seminar_Fall_2018 Fall 2018] | ||
Revision as of 18:48, 29 August 2019
When: Wednesdays 4:10pm
Where: Van Vleck B215 (Fall 2018)
Who: All undergraduate and graduate students interested in algebraic geometry, commutative algebra, and related fields are welcome to attend.
Why: The purpose of this seminar is to learn algebraic geometry and commutative algebra by giving and listening to talks in a informal setting. Talks are typically accessible to beginning graduate students and take many different forms. Sometimes people present an interesting paper they find. Other times people give a prep talk for the Friday Algebraic Geometry Seminar. Other times people give a series of talks on a topic they have been studying in-depth. Regardless the goal of GAGS is to provide a supportive and inclusive place for all to learn more about algebraic geometry and commutative algebra.
How: If you want to get emails regarding time, place, and talk topics (which are often assigned quite last minute) add yourself to the gags mailing list: gags@lists.wisc.edu. The list registration page is here.
Give a talk!
We need volunteers to give talks this semester. If you're interested contact Caitlyn or David, or just add yourself to the list (though in that case we might move your talk later without your permission). Beginning graduate students are particularly encouraged to give a talk, since it's a great way to get your feet wet with the material.
Being an audience member
The goal of GAGS is to create a safe and comfortable space inclusive of all who wish to expand their knowledge of algebraic geometry and commutative algebra. In order to promote such an environment in addition to the standard expectations of respect/kindness all participants are asked to following the following guidelines:
- Do Not Speak For/Over the Speaker:
- Ask Questions Appropriately:
The List of Topics that we Made February 2018
On February 21st of the Month of February of The 2018th Year of the Seventh Age of The Sun, the People Present at GAGS Compiled Ye Followinge Liste of Topics They Wished to Hear Aboute:
Feel free to edit the list and/or add references to learn this stuff from. Since then, we've succeeded in talking about some of these, which doesn't mean there shouldn't be another talk. Ask around or look at old semester's websites.
- Schubert Calculus, aka how many lines intersect four given lines in three-dimensional space? The answer to this question is prettiest when you think about it as a problem of intersecting subvarieties in the Grassmanian. What is the Grassmanian, you say? That's probably a talk we should have every year, so you should give it!
- Kindergarten GAGA. GAGA stands for Algebraic Geometry - Analytic Geometry. Serre wrote a famous paper explaining how the two are related, and you could give an exposition suitable to kindergardeners.
- Katz and Mazur explanation of what a modular form is. What is it?
- Kindergarten moduli of curves.
- What is a dualizing sheaf? What is a dualizing complex? What is Serre duality? What is local duality? Can local duality help us understand Serre duality?
- Generalizations of Riemann - Roch. (Grothendieck - Riemann - Roch? Hirzebruch - Riemann - Roch?)
- Hodge theory for babies
- What is a Néron model?
- What is a crystal? What does it have to do with D-modules? Here's an encouragingly short set of notes on it.
- What and why is a dessin d'enfants?
- DG Schemes.
Ed Dewey's Wish List Of Olde
Back in the day Ed and Nathan made this list of topics they wanted to hear. They all sound super duper cool, but it's also true that they had many years of AG behind their backs, so this list might not be very representative of what the GAGS audience wants to hear bout.
Here are the topics we're DYING to learn about! Please consider looking into one of these topics and giving one or two GAGS talks.
Specifically Vague Topics
- D-modules 101: basics of D-modules, equivalence between left and right D-modules, pullbacks, pushforwards, maybe the Gauss-Manin Connection. Claude Sabbah's introduction to the subject could be a good place to start.
- Sheaf operations on D-modules (the point is that then you can get a Fourier-Mukai transform between certain O-modules and certain D-modules, which is more or less how geometric Langlands is supposed to work)
Famous Theorems
Interesting Papers & Books
- Symplectic structure of the moduli space of sheaves on an abelian or K3 surface - Shigeru Mukai.
- Residues and Duality - Robin Hatshorne.
- Have you heard of Serre Duality? Would you like to really understand the nuts and bolts of it and its generalizations? If so this book is for you. (You wouldn't need to read the whole book to give a talk ;).)
- Coherent sheaves on P^n and problems in linear algebra - A. A. Beilinson.
- In this two page paper constructs the semi-orthogonal decomposition of the derived category of coherent sheaves on projective space. (This topic is very important, and there are a ton of other resources for this result and the general theory of derived categories.)
- Frobenius splitting and cohomology vanishing for Schubert varieties - V.B. Mehta and A. Ramanathan.
- In characteristic p the fact that (x+y)^p=x^p+y^p means that one has the Frobenius morphism, which sends f to f^p. In this paper the authors introduce the notion of what it means for a variety to be Frobenius split, and use this to prove certain cohomologcal vanishing results for Schubert varieties. Since then Frobenius splitting -- and its related cousins (F-regularity, strong F-regularity, F-purity, etc.) have played large roles in geometry and algebra in characteristic p. This is a good place to get a sense for what kicked all this stuff off!
- Schubert Calculus - S. L. Kleiman and Dan Laksov.
- An introduction to Schubert calculus suitable for those of all ages. I am told the paper essentially only uses linear algebra!
- Rational Isogenies of Prime Degree - Barry Mazur.
- In this paper Mazur classifies all isogenies of rational elliptic curves of prime order. As a result of this he deduces his famous result that the torsion subgroup of an elliptic curve (over Q) is one of 15 abelian groups. This definitely stares into the land of number theory, but certainly would still be of interest to many.
- Esquisse d’une programme - Alexander Grothendieck.
- Originating from a grant proposal in the mid 1980's this famous paper outlines a tantalizing research program, which seeks to tie numerous different areas of math (algebraic geometry, Teichmuller theory, Galois theory, etc.) together. This is where Grothendieck introduced his famous Lego game and dessin d'enfant. While just a research proposal this paper has seemingly inspired a ton of cool math, and will allow you to "blow peoples’ minds". (The original paper is in French, but there are English translations out there.)
- Géométrie algébraique et géométrie analytique - J.P. Serre.
- A projective variety X over the complex numbers has two lives, an algebraic and an analytic, depending on which topology one wishes to work with. That is one can think about X as a complex manifold and work with holomorphic functions or as an algebraic variety and work with regular functions. Hence to any complex projective variety we have two sheaf theories and as a result two cohomology theories. In this famous paper Serre compares these two and shows they are in fact the same. (Note: This is a super fundamental result that is used all the time; normally in the following way: Uhh... What do you mean by cohomology? Well by GAGA or something it doesn't really mater.) (The original paper is in French, but there are English translations out there.)
- Limit linear series: Basic theory- David Eisenbud and Joe Harris.
- One of the more profitable tools -- especially when studying moduli spaces -- in a geometers tool box is the theory of degenerations. However, sometimes we care about more than just the variety we are degenerating and want to keep track of things like vector/line bundles. In this paper Eisenbud and Harris develop the theory of degenerating a curve together with a linear series. From this they prove a ton of cool results: M_g is of general type for g>24, Brill-Noether theory, etc.
- Picard Groups of Moduli Problems - David Mumford.
- This paper is essentially the origin of algebraic stacks.
- The Structure of Algebraic Threefolds: An Introduction to Mori's Program - Janos Kollar
- This paper is an introduction to Mori's famous ``minimal model program, which is a far reaching program seeking to understand the birational geometry of higher dimensional varieties.
- Cayley-Bacharach Formulas - Qingchun Ren, Jürgen Richter-Gebert, Bernd Sturmfels.
- A classical result we all learn in a first semester of algebraic geometry is that 5 points in the plane (in general position) determine a unique plane conic. One can similarly show that 9 (general) points in the plane determine a unique plane cubic curve. This paper tries to answer the question: ``What is equation for this cubic curve?.
- On Varieties of Minimal Degree (A Centennial Approach) - David Eisenbud and Joe Harris.
- Suppose X is a projective variety embedded in projective space so that X is not contained in any hyperplane. By projecting from general points one can see that the degree of X is at least codim(X)+1. This paper discusses the classification of varieties that achieve this lower degree bound i.e. varieties of minimal degree. This topic is quite classical and the paper seems to contain a nice mixture of classical and modern geometry.
- The Gromov-Witten potential associated to a TCFT - Kevin J. Costello.
- This seems incredibly interesting, but fairing warning this paper has been described as highly technical, which considering it uses A-infinity algebras and the derived category of a Calabi-Yau seems like a reasonable description. (This paper may be covered in Caldararu's Spring 2017 topics course.)
Autumn 2018
Date | Speaker | Title (click to see abstract) |
September 12 | Moisés Herradón Cueto | Hodge Theory: One hour closer to understanding what it's about |
September 19 | Caitlyn Booms | Linear Resolutions of Edge Ideals |
September 26 | Qiao He | An Elementary Introduction to Geometric Langlands |
October 3 | Wanlin Li | Gonality of Curves and More |
October 10 | Ewan Dalby | A Gentle introduction to Grothendieck's Galois theory |
October 17 | Johnnie Han | Schubert Calculus |
October 24 | Solly Parenti | Quadratic Polynomials |
October 31 | Brandon Boggess | How to Parameterize Elliptic Curves and Influence People |
November 7 | Vladimir Sotirov | Morita Duality and Local Duality |
November 14 | David Wagner | Homological Projective Duality |
November 21 | A turkey/Smallpox | TBD |
November 28 | Asvin Gothandaraman | Deformation Theory |
December 5 | Soumya Sankar | One Step Closer to [math]\displaystyle{ B_{cris} }[/math] |
December 12 | Sun Woo Park | A Survey of Newton Polygons |
September 12
Moisés Herradón Cueto |
Title: Hodge Theory: One hour closer to understanding what it's about |
Abstract: Following the request for baby Hodge theory from our meeting last semester, I will speak for one hour about Hodge theory, starting from the beginning of times, as they say. There will be d's, dbar's, Kählers and Hodge structures, but that's the extent of my promises. It will be a joyful time! |
September 19
Caitlyn Booms |
Title: Linear Resolutions of Edge Ideals |
Abstract: We will briefly discuss monomial ideals in the multivariate polynomial ring over an algebraically closed field and some of their properties, including what it means for an ideal to have a linear resolution. Then we will talk about graphs on n vertices and their corresponding edge ideals, which are a particular kind of monomial ideal. Together, these will help us understand Froberg's Theorem, which says exactly when an edge ideal has a linear resolution. This talk will focus on a few computational examples and will end with some open questions and conjectures related to the presented material. |
September 26
Qiao He |
Title: An Elementary Introduction to Geometric Langlands |
Abstract: I will start with the a rough statement of global langlands correspondence which suggest some correspondence between Galois representation and automorphic representation. Given this motivation, I will try to explain how can we replace both Galois side and Automorphic side with algebraic geometry objects. After that I will sketch what the geometric Langlands should be in this context. |
October 3
Wanlin Li |
Title: Gonality of Curves and More |
Abstract: I will introduce an invariant, gonality of curves, from the definition, properties to its applications on modular curves. |
October 10
Ewan Dalby |
Title: A Gentle introduction to Grothendiecks Galois theory |
Abstract: We all know and love Galois theory as it applies to fields and their extensions. Grothendieck, as always, showed how to lever the same ideas much more generally in algebraic geometry. I will try to explain how things work for the case of commutative rings in an "elementary" fashion. |
October 17
Johnnie Han |
Title: Schubert Calculus |
Abstract: In this talk, we’ll go back to 19th-century Europe, when enumerative geometric questions like “how many lines intersect a quadric” or “how many lines lie on a cubic surface” were answered without even knowing the intersection pairing existed! We’ll go through the methods of Schubert calculus with examples and talk briefly about Steiner’s conics problem, when a famous mathematician was actually proven completely wrong. |
October 24
Solly Parenti |
Title: Quadratic Polynomials |
Abstract: Quadratic polynomials have been studied forever. You can't just like play around with them and expect cool exciting math things like modular forms or special values of L-functions to show up, that would be ridiculous. |
October 31
Brandon Boggess |
Title: How to Parameterize Elliptic Curves and Influence People |
Abstract: A classical guide to classifying curves for the geometrically minded grad student. I will assume basically zero AG background. |
November 7
Vladimir Sotirov |
Title: Morita duality and local duality |
Abstract: I will explain what it means for a ring to admit a dualizing module and how to construct such for nice local rings. |
November 14
David Wagner |
Title: Homological Projective Duality |
Abstract: I will introduce the derived category with the goal of undestanding Kuznetsov's HPD, a mysterious phenomenon which has produced a great number of examples and theorems in AG. We will give a demonstration of the duality in the case of an intersection of quadrics. |
November 21
TBD |
Title: TBD |
Abstract: TBD |
November 28
Asvin G |
Title: Deformation Theory |
Abstract: I will explain what deformation theory is and how to use it by doing a few examples. |
November 7
TBD |
Title: TBD |
Abstract: TBD |
December 5
Soumya Sankar |
Title: One Step Closet to [math]\displaystyle{ B_{cris} }[/math] |
Abstract: I will talk about various comparison theorems in [math]\displaystyle{ p }[/math]-adic cohomology, and time permitting, describe the crystalline side of things in greater detail. |
December 12
Sun Woo Park |
Title: A Survey of Newton Polygons |
Abstract: I will give a survey on how understanding newton polygons can be useful in solving many different problems in algebraic geometry: from the proof of p-adic Weierstrass Formula to the re-formulization of Tate's Algorithm for elliptic curves. (Since I will focus on providing various applications of newton polygons, I will not be able to present rigorous proofs to most of the statements I will make in this talk.) |
Organizers' Contact Info