Probability Seminar: Difference between revisions

From DEV UW-Math Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ewbates (talk | contribs)
 
(267 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
[[Probability | Back to Probability Group]]


= Fall 2020 =
* '''When''': Thursdays at 2:30 pm
* '''Where''': 901 Van Vleck Hall
* '''Organizers''': Hongchang Ji, Ander Aguirre, Hai-Xiao Wang
* '''To join the probability seminar mailing list:''' email probsem+subscribe@g-groups.wisc.edu.
* '''To subscribe seminar lunch announcements:''' email lunchwithprobsemspeaker+subscribe@g-groups.wisc.edu


<b>Thursdays in 901 Van Vleck Hall at 2:30 PM</b>, unless otherwise noted.
[[Past Seminars]]
<b>We  usually end for questions at 3:20 PM.</b>
 
<b> IMPORTANT: </b> In Fall 2020 the seminar is being run online. [https://uwmadison.zoom.us/j/91828707031?pwd=YUJXMUJkMDlPR0VRdkRCQVJtVndIdz09 ZOOM LINK]
 
If you would like to sign up for the email list to receive seminar announcements then please join [https://groups.google.com/a/g-groups.wisc.edu/forum/#!forum/probsem our group].
== September 17, 2020, [https://www.math.tamu.edu/~bhanin/ Boris Hanin] (Princeton and Texas A&M) ==


'''Pre-Talk: (1:00pm)'''
== Fall 2025 ==


'''Neural Networks for Probabilists''' 
<b>Thursdays at 2:30 PM either in 901 Van Vleck Hall or on Zoom</b>


Deep neural networks are a centerpiece in modern machine learning. They are also fascinating probabilistic models, about which much remains unclear. In this pre-talk I will define neural networks, explain how they are used in practice, and give a survey of the big theoretical questions they have raised. If time permits, I will also explain how neural networks are related to a variety of classical areas in probability and mathematical physics, including random matrix theory, optimal transport, and combinatorics of hyperplane arrangements.
We usually end for questions at 3:20 PM.


'''Talk: (2:30pm)'''
== September 4, 2025: No seminar ==


'''Effective Theory of Deep Neural Networks'''
== September 11, 2025: David Renfrew (Binghamton U.) ==


Deep neural networks are often considered to be complicated "black boxes," for which a full systematic analysis is not only out of reach but also impossible. In this talk, which is based on ongoing joint work with Sho Yaida and Daniel Adam Roberts, I will make the opposite claim. Namely, that deep neural networks with random weights and biases are exactly solvable models. Our approach applies to networks at finite width n and large depth L, the regime in which they are used in practice. A key point will be the emergence of a notion of "criticality," which involves a finetuning of model parameters (weight and bias variances). At criticality, neural networks are particularly well-behaved but still exhibit a tension between large values for n and L, with large values of n tending to make neural networks more like Gaussian processes and large values of L amplifying higher cumulants. Our analysis at initialization has many consequences also for networks during after training, which I will discuss if time permits.


== September 24, 2020, [https://people.ucd.ie/neil.oconnell Neil O'Connell] (Dublin)  ==
'''Singularities in the spectrum of random block matrices'''


'''Some new perspectives on moments of random matrices'''
We consider the density of states of structured Hermitian and non-Hermitian random matrices with a variance profile. As the dimension tends to infinity the associated eigenvalue density can develop a singularity at the origin. The severity of this singularity depends on the relative positions of the zero submatrices. We provide a classification of all possible singularities and determine the exponent in the density blow-up.


The study of `moments' of random matrices (expectations of traces of powers of the matrix) is a rich and interesting subject, with fascinating connections to enumerative geometry, as discovered by Harer and Zagier in the 1980’s. I will give some background on this and then describe some recent work which offers some new perspectives (and new results). This talk is based on joint work with Fabio Deelan Cunden, Francesco Mezzadri and Nick Simm.
== September 18, 2025: JE Paguyo (McMaster U.) ==
'''Asymptotic behavior of the hierarchical Pitman-Yor and Dirichlet processes'''


== October 1, 2020, [https://marcusmichelen.org/ Marcus Michelen] (UIC) ==
The Pitman-Yor process is a discrete random measure specified by a concentration parameter, discount parameter, and base distribution, and is used as a fundamental prior in Bayesian nonparametrics. The hierarchical Pitman-Yor process (HPYP) is a generalization obtained by randomizing the base distribution through a draw from another Pitman-Yor process. It is motivated by the study of groups of clustered data, where the group specific Pitman-Yor processes are linked through an intergroup Pitman-Yor process. Setting both discount parameters to zero recovers the celebrated hierarchical Dirichlet process (HDP), first introduced by Teh et al.
In this talk, we discuss our recent work on the asymptotic behavior of the HPYP and HDP. First, we establish limit theorems associated with the power sum symmetric polynomials for the vector of weights of the HDP as the concentration parameters tend to infinity. These objects are related to the homozygosity in population genetics, the Simpson diversity index in ecology, and the Herfindahl-Hirschman index in economics. Second, we consider a random sample of size $N$ from a population whose type distribution is given by the vector of weights of the HPYP and study the large $N$ asymptotic behavior of the number of clusters in the sample. Our approach relies on a random sample size representation of the number of clusters through the corresponding non-hierarchical process. This talk is based on joint work with Stefano Favaro and Shui Feng.


'''Roots of random polynomials near the unit circle'''
== September 25, 2025: Chris Janjigian (Purdue U.) ==


It is a well-known (but perhaps surprising) fact that a polynomial with independent random coefficients has most of its roots very close to the unit circle.  Using a probabilistic perspective, we understand the behavior of roots of random polynomials exceptionally close to the unit circle and prove several limit theorems; these results resolve several conjectures of Shepp and Vanderbei.  We will also discuss how our techniques provide a heuristic, probabilistic explanation for why random polynomials tend to have most roots near the unit circle.  Based on joint work with Julian Sahasrabudhe.
== October 2, 2025: Elliot Paquette (McGill U.) ==


== October 8, 2020, [http://sites.harvard.edu/~sus977/index.html Subhabrata Sen] (Harvard) ==
== October 9, 2025: No seminar (Midwest Probability Colloquium) ==


'''Large deviations for dense random graphs: beyond mean-field'''
== October 16, 2025: Zachary Selk (Florida State U.) ==


In a seminal paper, Chatterjee and Varadhan derived an Erdős-Rényi random graph, viewed as a random graphon. This directly provides LDPs for continuous functionals such as subgraph counts, spectral norms, etc. In contrast, very little is understood about this problem if the underlying random graph is inhomogeneous or constrained.
'''<br />On the Onsager-Machlup Function for the \Phi^4 Measure'''


In this talk, we will explore large deviations for dense random graphs, beyond the “mean-field” setting. In particular, we will study large deviations for uniform random graphs with given degrees, and a family of dense block model
The \Phi^4 measure is a measure arising in effective quantum field theory as arguably the simplest example of a nontrivial QFT, modelling the self-interaction of a single scalar quantum field. This measure can be constructed through a procedure known as stochastic quantization. Stochastic quantization seeks to construct a measure on an infinite dimensional space with a given Gibbs-type ``density function" as the invariant measure of a stochastic PDE, in analogy with Langevin dynamics of stochastic ODEs. Both the \Phi^4 measure and its associated stochastic quantization PDE involve nonlinearities of distributions, necessitating renormalization procedures via tools like Wick calculus, regularity structures or paracontrolled calculus. Although the \Phi^4 measure has been constructed in dimensions 1,2 and 3, the question of whether these measures have the desired ``density function" remains open. Although in infinite dimensions, density functions are typically thought to not exist as there is no reference Lebesgue measure, there is a notion of a probability density function that extends to infinite dimensions called the Onsager-Machlup (OM) functional. One pathology of OM theory is that different metrics can lead to different OM functionals, or OM functionals can fail to exist under reasonable metrics. In a joint work with Ioannis Gasteratos (TU Berlin), we study the OM functional for the \Phi^4 measure. In dimension 1, the OM functional is what is desired under naive choices of metrics. In dimension 2, the OM functional is what is desired if we choose a metric analogous to the rough paths metric. In dimension 3, naive approaches don't work and the situation is complicated.
random graphs. We will establish the LDP in each case, and identify the rate function. In the block model setting, we will use this LDP to study the upper tail problem for homomorphism densities of regular sub-graphs. Our results establish that this problem exhibits a symmetry/symmetry-breaking transition, similar to one observed for Erdős-Rényi random graphs.


Based on joint works with Christian Borgs, Jennifer Chayes, Souvik Dhara, Julia Gaudio and Samantha Petti.


== October 15, 2020, [https://math.cornell.edu/philippe-sosoe Philippe Sosoe] (Cornell) ==
==October 23, 2025: Alex Dunlap (Duke U.)==


Title: '''TBA'''
==October 30, 2025: Ander Aguirre (UW-Madison)==


Abstract: TBA
'''Edgeworth expansion and random polynomials'''


==October 22, 2020, [http://www.math.toronto.edu/balint/ Balint Virag] (Toronto) ==
==November 6, 2025: Sudeshna Bhattacharjee (Indian Institute of Science)==


Title: '''TBA'''
== November 13, 2025: Jiaoyang Huang (U. Penn) ==
 
Abstract: TBA
 
==October 29, 2020, [https://www.math.wisc.edu/node/80 Yun Li] (UW-Madison) ==
 
Title: '''TBA'''
 
Abstract: TBA
 
== November 5, 2020, [http://sayan.web.unc.edu/ Sayan Banerjee] (UNC at Chapel Hill) ==
 
Title: '''TBA'''
 
Abstract: TBA
 
== November 12, 2020, [https://cims.nyu.edu/~ajd594/ Alexander Dunlap] (NYU Courant Institute) ==
 
Title: '''TBA'''
 
Abstract: TBA
 
== November 19, 2020, [https://statistics.wharton.upenn.edu/profile/dingjian/ Jian Ding] (University of Pennsylvania) ==
 
Title: '''TBA'''
 
Abstract: TBA
 
== December 3, 2020, Tatyana Shcherbina (UW-Madison) ==
 
Title: '''TBA'''
 
Abstract: TBA
 
== December 10, 2020, [https://www.ewbates.com/ Erik Bates] (UW-Madison) ==
 
Title: '''TBA'''
 
Abstract: TBA
 
 
[[Past Seminars]]

Latest revision as of 01:17, 2 September 2025

Back to Probability Group

  • When: Thursdays at 2:30 pm
  • Where: 901 Van Vleck Hall
  • Organizers: Hongchang Ji, Ander Aguirre, Hai-Xiao Wang
  • To join the probability seminar mailing list: email probsem+subscribe@g-groups.wisc.edu.
  • To subscribe seminar lunch announcements: email lunchwithprobsemspeaker+subscribe@g-groups.wisc.edu

Past Seminars

Fall 2025

Thursdays at 2:30 PM either in 901 Van Vleck Hall or on Zoom

We usually end for questions at 3:20 PM.

September 4, 2025: No seminar

September 11, 2025: David Renfrew (Binghamton U.)

Singularities in the spectrum of random block matrices

We consider the density of states of structured Hermitian and non-Hermitian random matrices with a variance profile. As the dimension tends to infinity the associated eigenvalue density can develop a singularity at the origin. The severity of this singularity depends on the relative positions of the zero submatrices. We provide a classification of all possible singularities and determine the exponent in the density blow-up.

September 18, 2025: JE Paguyo (McMaster U.)

Asymptotic behavior of the hierarchical Pitman-Yor and Dirichlet processes

The Pitman-Yor process is a discrete random measure specified by a concentration parameter, discount parameter, and base distribution, and is used as a fundamental prior in Bayesian nonparametrics. The hierarchical Pitman-Yor process (HPYP) is a generalization obtained by randomizing the base distribution through a draw from another Pitman-Yor process. It is motivated by the study of groups of clustered data, where the group specific Pitman-Yor processes are linked through an intergroup Pitman-Yor process. Setting both discount parameters to zero recovers the celebrated hierarchical Dirichlet process (HDP), first introduced by Teh et al. In this talk, we discuss our recent work on the asymptotic behavior of the HPYP and HDP. First, we establish limit theorems associated with the power sum symmetric polynomials for the vector of weights of the HDP as the concentration parameters tend to infinity. These objects are related to the homozygosity in population genetics, the Simpson diversity index in ecology, and the Herfindahl-Hirschman index in economics. Second, we consider a random sample of size $N$ from a population whose type distribution is given by the vector of weights of the HPYP and study the large $N$ asymptotic behavior of the number of clusters in the sample. Our approach relies on a random sample size representation of the number of clusters through the corresponding non-hierarchical process. This talk is based on joint work with Stefano Favaro and Shui Feng.

September 25, 2025: Chris Janjigian (Purdue U.)

October 2, 2025: Elliot Paquette (McGill U.)

October 9, 2025: No seminar (Midwest Probability Colloquium)

October 16, 2025: Zachary Selk (Florida State U.)


On the Onsager-Machlup Function for the \Phi^4 Measure

The \Phi^4 measure is a measure arising in effective quantum field theory as arguably the simplest example of a nontrivial QFT, modelling the self-interaction of a single scalar quantum field. This measure can be constructed through a procedure known as stochastic quantization. Stochastic quantization seeks to construct a measure on an infinite dimensional space with a given Gibbs-type ``density function" as the invariant measure of a stochastic PDE, in analogy with Langevin dynamics of stochastic ODEs. Both the \Phi^4 measure and its associated stochastic quantization PDE involve nonlinearities of distributions, necessitating renormalization procedures via tools like Wick calculus, regularity structures or paracontrolled calculus. Although the \Phi^4 measure has been constructed in dimensions 1,2 and 3, the question of whether these measures have the desired ``density function" remains open. Although in infinite dimensions, density functions are typically thought to not exist as there is no reference Lebesgue measure, there is a notion of a probability density function that extends to infinite dimensions called the Onsager-Machlup (OM) functional. One pathology of OM theory is that different metrics can lead to different OM functionals, or OM functionals can fail to exist under reasonable metrics. In a joint work with Ioannis Gasteratos (TU Berlin), we study the OM functional for the \Phi^4 measure. In dimension 1, the OM functional is what is desired under naive choices of metrics. In dimension 2, the OM functional is what is desired if we choose a metric analogous to the rough paths metric. In dimension 3, naive approaches don't work and the situation is complicated.


October 23, 2025: Alex Dunlap (Duke U.)

October 30, 2025: Ander Aguirre (UW-Madison)

Edgeworth expansion and random polynomials

November 6, 2025: Sudeshna Bhattacharjee (Indian Institute of Science)

November 13, 2025: Jiaoyang Huang (U. Penn)