NTSGrad Spring 2022/Abstracts: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | {| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' | | bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' ''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | '' | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | ''TBA'' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | In his [https://people.math.wisc.edu/~ellenber/gradstudents.html notes for students], Jordan has a list of general topics and references in number theory/algebraic geometry/arithmetic geometry that students in arithmetic geometry should be comfortable with after a certain point of time. I will introduce some language used in these general topics for beginners. | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | In his [https://people.math.wisc.edu/~ellenber/gradstudents.html notes for students], Jordan has a list of general topics and references in number theory/algebraic geometry/arithmetic geometry that students in arithmetic geometry should be comfortable with after a certain point of time. I will introduce some language used in these general topics for beginners. | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | {| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' | | bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' ''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | '' | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | ''TBA'' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | In this talk, I will go over the history of rational/integral points on curves. In particular, I will introduce a recent proof of the S-unit equation using p-adic period maps, given by Lawrence-Venkatesh. | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | In this talk, I will go over the history of rational/integral points on curves. In particular, I will introduce a recent proof of the S-unit equation using p-adic period maps, given by Lawrence-Venkatesh. | ||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | {| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' | | bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' ''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | ''TBA'' | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | ''TBA'' | ||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | {| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' | | bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' ''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | '' | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | ''TBA'' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | Geometry over char p is fascinating or frustrating, depending on who you are. However varieties over char 0 could be enjoyed by geometers of all kinds. We will dicuss one way of lifting a smooth projective variety from char p to char 0. After applying our technique to curves we briefly mention the situation in higher dimensions. And if time permits, we discuss a non-liftable example by Serre. | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | Geometry over char p is fascinating or frustrating, depending on who you are. However varieties over char 0 could be enjoyed by geometers of all kinds. We will dicuss one way of lifting a smooth projective variety from char p to char 0. After applying our technique to curves we briefly mention the situation in higher dimensions. And if time permits, we discuss a non-liftable example by Serre. | ||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | {| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' | | bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' ''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | ''TBA'' | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | ''TBA'' | ||
Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | {| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' | | bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' ''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | ''TBA'' | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | ''TBA'' | ||
Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | {| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' | | bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' ''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | '' | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | ''TBA'' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | I will introduce Euler's classical result over Q, Klingen-Siegel theorem over totally real number fields, and Zagier's theorems and conjectures over general number fields. I will give many examples and discuss their proofs. If time permits, I will discuss its relation with K-theory. | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | I will introduce Euler's classical result over Q, Klingen-Siegel theorem over totally real number fields, and Zagier's theorems and conjectures over general number fields. I will give many examples and discuss their proofs. If time permits, I will discuss its relation with K-theory. | ||
Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | {| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' | | bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' ''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | '' | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | ''TBA'' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | Diophantine approximation is a crucial tool in studying integral points and Schlickewei's theorem is a very useful theorem in proving finiteness theorems on integral points. In the first part of my talk I will show some elegant proof as applications of the subspace theorem such as Vojta's theorem, the S-unit equation, and then I will introduce main conjectures: Vojta, Mordell, Bombieri and Lang, and their relations to each other. | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | Diophantine approximation is a crucial tool in studying integral points and Schlickewei's theorem is a very useful theorem in proving finiteness theorems on integral points. In the first part of my talk I will show some elegant proof as applications of the subspace theorem such as Vojta's theorem, the S-unit equation, and then I will introduce main conjectures: Vojta, Mordell, Bombieri and Lang, and their relations to each other. | ||
Line 132: | Line 132: | ||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | {| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' | | bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' ''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | ''TBA'' | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | ''TBA'' | ||
Line 147: | Line 147: | ||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | {| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' | | bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' ''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | ''TBA'' | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | ''TBA'' | ||
Line 164: | Line 164: | ||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | {| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' | | bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' ''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | '' | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | ''TBA'' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | | ||
Line 184: | Line 184: | ||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | {| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' | | bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' ''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | '' | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | ''TBA'' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | In this talk, we will walk through a simple example of counting quadratic extensions using the discriminant. Although, this has been done using classical methods, we will highlight the techniques used by Bhargava through our example, that were essentially used to count the higher degree cases. | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | In this talk, we will walk through a simple example of counting quadratic extensions using the discriminant. Although, this has been done using classical methods, we will highlight the techniques used by Bhargava through our example, that were essentially used to count the higher degree cases. | ||
Line 202: | Line 202: | ||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | {| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' | | bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' ''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | '' | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | ''TBA'' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | Given a positive definite quadratic form X_1^2+...+X_n^2, a natural question to ask is can we find a formula for $r_n(m)=\#\{X\in Z^n| Q(X)=m\}$. Although no explicit formula for $r_n(m)$ is known in general, there do exist an average formula, which is a prototype of the so called Siegel-Weil formula. In this talk, I will introduce Siegel-Weil formula, and show how Deuring's mass formula for supersingular elliptic curve and Hurwitz class number formula follows from Siegel-Weil formula. | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | Given a positive definite quadratic form X_1^2+...+X_n^2, a natural question to ask is can we find a formula for $r_n(m)=\#\{X\in Z^n| Q(X)=m\}$. Although no explicit formula for $r_n(m)$ is known in general, there do exist an average formula, which is a prototype of the so called Siegel-Weil formula. In this talk, I will introduce Siegel-Weil formula, and show how Deuring's mass formula for supersingular elliptic curve and Hurwitz class number formula follows from Siegel-Weil formula. | ||
Line 219: | Line 219: | ||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | {| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' | | bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' ''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | '' | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | ''TBA'' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | I will motivate and introduce the definition of a height. Then, I will talk a bit about Arakelov height. This will then lead into a recent paper by Ellenberg, Satriano, and Zureick-Brown, which introduces a notion of height on stacks. | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | I will motivate and introduce the definition of a height. Then, I will talk a bit about Arakelov height. This will then lead into a recent paper by Ellenberg, Satriano, and Zureick-Brown, which introduces a notion of height on stacks. | ||
Line 239: | Line 239: | ||
{| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | {| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | ''' | | bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | '''Jerry Yu Fu''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | '' | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | ''Canonical lifting and size of isogeny classes'' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | I will give a brief review from Serre-Tate's canonical lifting theorem, the Grothendieck-Messing theory and their applications to class group and isogeny classes of certain type of abelian varieties over finite fields. | ||
I will present some recently proved results by me and some with my collaborator. | |||
Revision as of 02:32, 24 January 2022
This page contains the titles and abstracts for talks scheduled in the Fall 2021 semester. To go back to the main GNTS page, click here.
Jan 25
TBA |
In his notes for students, Jordan has a list of general topics and references in number theory/algebraic geometry/arithmetic geometry that students in arithmetic geometry should be comfortable with after a certain point of time. I will introduce some language used in these general topics for beginners. |
Feb 1
TBA |
In this talk, I will go over the history of rational/integral points on curves. In particular, I will introduce a recent proof of the S-unit equation using p-adic period maps, given by Lawrence-Venkatesh. |
Feb 8
TBA |
|}
Feb 15
TBA |
Geometry over char p is fascinating or frustrating, depending on who you are. However varieties over char 0 could be enjoyed by geometers of all kinds. We will dicuss one way of lifting a smooth projective variety from char p to char 0. After applying our technique to curves we briefly mention the situation in higher dimensions. And if time permits, we discuss a non-liftable example by Serre. |
Feb 25
TBA |
Mar 1
TBA |
Mar 8
TBA |
I will introduce Euler's classical result over Q, Klingen-Siegel theorem over totally real number fields, and Zagier's theorems and conjectures over general number fields. I will give many examples and discuss their proofs. If time permits, I will discuss its relation with K-theory. |
Mar 15
TBA |
Diophantine approximation is a crucial tool in studying integral points and Schlickewei's theorem is a very useful theorem in proving finiteness theorems on integral points. In the first part of my talk I will show some elegant proof as applications of the subspace theorem such as Vojta's theorem, the S-unit equation, and then I will introduce main conjectures: Vojta, Mordell, Bombieri and Lang, and their relations to each other. |
Mar 22
TBA |
Mar 29
TBA |
|
Apr 5
TBA |
I will talk about local reciprocity, a correspondence of the Galois group of the maximal abelian extension and the multiplicative group. In particular, I will talk about Lubin-Tate theory which constructs this map.
|
Apr 12
TBA |
In this talk, we will walk through a simple example of counting quadratic extensions using the discriminant. Although, this has been done using classical methods, we will highlight the techniques used by Bhargava through our example, that were essentially used to count the higher degree cases.
|
Apr 19
TBA |
Given a positive definite quadratic form X_1^2+...+X_n^2, a natural question to ask is can we find a formula for $r_n(m)=\#\{X\in Z^n| Q(X)=m\}$. Although no explicit formula for $r_n(m)$ is known in general, there do exist an average formula, which is a prototype of the so called Siegel-Weil formula. In this talk, I will introduce Siegel-Weil formula, and show how Deuring's mass formula for supersingular elliptic curve and Hurwitz class number formula follows from Siegel-Weil formula.
|
Apr 26
TBA |
I will motivate and introduce the definition of a height. Then, I will talk a bit about Arakelov height. This will then lead into a recent paper by Ellenberg, Satriano, and Zureick-Brown, which introduces a notion of height on stacks.
|
May 3
Jerry Yu Fu |
Canonical lifting and size of isogeny classes |
I will give a brief review from Serre-Tate's canonical lifting theorem, the Grothendieck-Messing theory and their applications to class group and isogeny classes of certain type of abelian varieties over finite fields.
I will present some recently proved results by me and some with my collaborator.
|